Prediction of Nadin Ercegovic vs Cora Hofmann Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Ercegovic vs C. Hofmann

Nadin Ercegovic

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

337

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Cora Hofmann

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

337

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Ercegovic 1 - 0 Hofmann

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nadin Ercegovic winning 2 and Cora Hofmann winning 0. The last match between Nadin Ercegovic and Cora Hofmann was at the ITF Marsa, 16-04-1990, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Nadin Ercegovic getting the victory 6-3 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ercegovic	1
Hofmann	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Marsa(04-16-90)

Stats

Nadin Ercegovic

Cora Hofmann

N. Ercegovic vs C. Hofmann H2H Profile

N. Ercegovic	Stats	C. Hofmann
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
51.97% (119-110)	Career Total W/L	50.77% (66-64)
1	Clay	0
3	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Ercegovic vs C. Hofmann Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nadin Ercegovic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cora Hofmann has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nadin Ercegovic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cora Hofmann has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nadin Ercegovic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cora Hofmann has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nadin Ercegovic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cora Hofmann winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nadin Ercegovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 92/70), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 11% (W/L 1/8). Cora Hofmann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 14/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 29/39).
Player level: In the last year, Nadin Ercegovic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cora Hofmann has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nadin Ercegovic winning 1 times and Cora Hofmann being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nadin Ercegovic winning 2 and Cora Hofmann winning 0.
The last match between Nadin Ercegovic and Cora Hofmann was at the ITF Marsa, 16-04-1990, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Nadin Ercegovic getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nadin Ercegovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cora Hofmann has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nadin Ercegovic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cora Hofmann has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nadin Ercegovic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cora Hofmann has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nadin Ercegovic vs Cora Hofmann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Ercegovic vs C. Hofmann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Ercegovic	Stats	C. Hofmann
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Ercegovic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Salzburg 25K - 10-06-1996
R3 Magui SernaM. Serna	L	5-7 6-2 6-4	Stats
Budapest - 06-05-1996
Q1 Petra MandulaP. Mandula	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Bol - 29-04-1996
R3 Lea GhirardiL. Ghirardi	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Essen - 19-02-1996
Q1 Els CallensE. Callens	L	7-6 6-2	Stats
Paris - 13-02-1996
Q1 Isabelle DemongeotI. Demongeot	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Hofmann Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Nicosia 10K - 07-10-1996
R3 Antoaneta PandjerovaA. Pandjerova	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Thessaloniki 10K - 30-09-1996
R3 Desislava TopalovaD. Topalova	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Lohja 10K - 01-07-1996
R3 Sofie AlbinusS. Albinus	L	1-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
Nuremberg 10K - 21-02-1996
R3 Martina NedelkovaM. Nedelkova	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
ITF Langenthal - 16-10-1995
R3 Alice PirsuA. Pirsu	L	6-4 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Ercegovic vs C. Hofmann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Ercegovic	Stats	C. Hofmann
51.97% (119/110)	YTD Win/Loss	50.77% (66/64)
52.45% (268/243)	Sets Win/Loss	49.34% (150/154)
51.43% (2309/2181)	Games Win/Loss	49.80% (1367/1378)
48.65% (18/19)	Hard Win/Loss	53.85% (14/12)
56.79% (92/70)	Clay Win/Loss	42.65% (29/39)
22.22% (2/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	63.89% (23/13)
50.00% (6/6)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
382.07	Average Opponent Rank	529.19
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (13/13)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
60.17% (71/47)	Challenger W/L	53.91% (62/53)
16.67% (1/5)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
52% (119/229)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (65/128)
50% (6/12)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	42% (5/12)
43% (23/53)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (25/44)
90% (122/110)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (57/48)
10% (122/12)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (57/8)
8% (107/9)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (73/17)